Steve
the EX-QUEEN of FW~!
Just a little something to spur discussion, or completely be ignored. You know, whatever works, really.
Starting out on Prodigy in 1992 the CSWA's changed with the times, as both Chad and I's desires dictated and the FW community.
The first year on Prodigy we used the imfamous dice system, a rather brilliantly (cough) constructed, enjoyable system that kept a wrestler's strength tied to being 'odd' or 'even'. Most of the matches were tension filled, but not all together dependent on luck. There was a skill to developing a character's move list, and debating whether a bad roll (i.e. one against your man) hit an illegal object or didn't get enough elevation under it to start with (i.e. Sean May). Jon Katz's very own Mike Randalls won his first world title at the hands of the 30, 12, 10, and 8 sided die. See, there was a method to the madness. The dice knew! I remember some of that match..Randalls beating Flic Rair and Chad and I thinking, "Should we roll the pin again? I mean....who's Mike Randalls?" Though Chad was known to cheat, I never did...so being the voice of reason, Randalls' victory was upheld, and I'd say Jon has gone on to prove my decision to be the right one.
By '93 there was a growing amount of chatter, from members and non-members alike that we should adapt to 'RP' form of booking matches. We did, mainly because it was easier than rolling dice. That's where the league remains now. Judging matches on quality of role-play.
But...what about angles?
(dramatic beat, cue Hitchcock: "There's been a murrrrrrrrder.")
Taken into account, a backbone of the CSWA, and most any league now.
Obviously running a league has advanced from posting 'open challenge' notes, collecting and signing matches then letting the boys and girls go at it. Most lineups are prebooked now, which begs the question, "why do we still role-play?"
Is FW still a 'game' where card to card you're competing against another handler, or should leagues mirror real wrestling? Are we all apart of a booking team that's creating a final product for others and ourselves to enjoy?
The Eli Flair/Windham match at ANNIVERSARY that neither Pete and i have roleplayed for, for some reason has been set up for six months (CSWA TIME 2 weeks), the finish prebooked, and a new angle spinning from the finish. Does this make roleplay any less enjoyable?
Not for me. I love the week to week competition rp for the NFW, but with this match the fun was in planning the match and writing a rp series that sadly never quite materalized fully, but it was there.
My question is where do you see yourself? A week to week warrior, or a long-term booker?
I find it hillarious when handlers talk to me today about protecting their win/loss record, as if, if they were to lose a match they'll have to be talked into staying with the league. In this game you're going to lose, period. There's nothing I despise more (okay Dook) than someone building their character as a inmoveable object, a shoot figher so to speak who just cannot lose. His or her character would be immeasurably damaged by a loss, because he's the toughest man in wrestling!!
Kurt Angle takes losses. Who in that WWE locker room could actually pin him? Lesner?
We're telling a story, and golden boy characters are a bore to me. The idea that someone could struggle with playing off "a loss" is laughable. It's FW wrestling people.
Although in losses, or matches its of major importance in how a character is handled.
Again, i like the NFW old-school format, though I'm sure some matches have been prebooked, and others left to angles, for the most part it's competition role-play, and ba ba ba ba i'm lovin' it.
What do you look for in role-play? Can role-play wars turn into more than: "You have bad hair." "Man, your wife is a skank." "I beat you once, I beat you again." "Yeah right."
Okay i'm actually posting that as the first Windham role-play to Eli. But, moving along.......is rp more than name-calling? Is it a game of who's the wittiest?
You get to a point, well I do at least, when how do you judge some of this? Who do you choose?
Angles? Long-term booking?
I look at the FWO (and other leagues like it) and think in some respects they 'get it'. That's the model I'd like the CSWA to use, but having recently joined there's much i'd change.
In the FWO role-play is recreational.
Handlers activity in the league is based on writing their own matches for cards (in narrative form) and any card segments, crash tv style or otherwise.
In some respects that makes perfect sense. All energy focused on getting cards up. The fwo moves like wild fire and the attractiveness in that is a big-time selling point.
However, as to my involvment in the league it's too angle based. Maybe that's just because i've spent so many years doing it one way. Finding your own matches in the league, essentially being left to book yourself has been a major letdown for me. In the fwo you're part of the writing team, and less of a character handler.
I've found that to steal a lot of my preacceptance into the league excitement. Having to scamper on AOL IM, or the message boards to ask for matches, and then decide who 'goes over' this week is so alien to his cold, black heart. At some point yes long term angles should come into play and handlers could book themselves for a while, but week to week it appears easy to be left out in the cold. But thats probably completely by own doing. There's nothing stopping me from signging onto the message board and saying, "Guys i need a match for Ruahh" and I'd probably get one.
Accepting that dramatic of a change in style has been hard.
But...i think the direction the CSWA needs to go, and a lot of where some of us are going, is a mixture of the two schools.
I'd want someone to book me, tell me who i'm facing week to week and who's going over, but more hands writing the cards, and more people brainstorming about angles for their characters is the way to go.
I"m ranting. Any thoughts to any of this?
Do win/loss records in FW matter?
Is a RP fed the best?
Is RP dead?
Am I the spawn of Louie Anderson for finding some fault with the FWO?
Will UCONN do the world a favor and beat Dook?
Does Marlena's recent serial killer turn mean a Marlena/Roman reunion is out of the picture?
Will the Lawerence Brothers ever work again?
And will Pete Russo begin talking in one-word replies in the near future?
These questions and more answered on the next.........."Tom Sigel Show".
(shudders trying to imagine that. It'd have to be "100 questions with Tom Sigel". That's the format. Heh.)
Starting out on Prodigy in 1992 the CSWA's changed with the times, as both Chad and I's desires dictated and the FW community.
The first year on Prodigy we used the imfamous dice system, a rather brilliantly (cough) constructed, enjoyable system that kept a wrestler's strength tied to being 'odd' or 'even'. Most of the matches were tension filled, but not all together dependent on luck. There was a skill to developing a character's move list, and debating whether a bad roll (i.e. one against your man) hit an illegal object or didn't get enough elevation under it to start with (i.e. Sean May). Jon Katz's very own Mike Randalls won his first world title at the hands of the 30, 12, 10, and 8 sided die. See, there was a method to the madness. The dice knew! I remember some of that match..Randalls beating Flic Rair and Chad and I thinking, "Should we roll the pin again? I mean....who's Mike Randalls?" Though Chad was known to cheat, I never did...so being the voice of reason, Randalls' victory was upheld, and I'd say Jon has gone on to prove my decision to be the right one.
By '93 there was a growing amount of chatter, from members and non-members alike that we should adapt to 'RP' form of booking matches. We did, mainly because it was easier than rolling dice. That's where the league remains now. Judging matches on quality of role-play.
But...what about angles?
(dramatic beat, cue Hitchcock: "There's been a murrrrrrrrder.")
Taken into account, a backbone of the CSWA, and most any league now.
Obviously running a league has advanced from posting 'open challenge' notes, collecting and signing matches then letting the boys and girls go at it. Most lineups are prebooked now, which begs the question, "why do we still role-play?"
Is FW still a 'game' where card to card you're competing against another handler, or should leagues mirror real wrestling? Are we all apart of a booking team that's creating a final product for others and ourselves to enjoy?
The Eli Flair/Windham match at ANNIVERSARY that neither Pete and i have roleplayed for, for some reason has been set up for six months (CSWA TIME 2 weeks), the finish prebooked, and a new angle spinning from the finish. Does this make roleplay any less enjoyable?
Not for me. I love the week to week competition rp for the NFW, but with this match the fun was in planning the match and writing a rp series that sadly never quite materalized fully, but it was there.
My question is where do you see yourself? A week to week warrior, or a long-term booker?
I find it hillarious when handlers talk to me today about protecting their win/loss record, as if, if they were to lose a match they'll have to be talked into staying with the league. In this game you're going to lose, period. There's nothing I despise more (okay Dook) than someone building their character as a inmoveable object, a shoot figher so to speak who just cannot lose. His or her character would be immeasurably damaged by a loss, because he's the toughest man in wrestling!!
Kurt Angle takes losses. Who in that WWE locker room could actually pin him? Lesner?
We're telling a story, and golden boy characters are a bore to me. The idea that someone could struggle with playing off "a loss" is laughable. It's FW wrestling people.
Although in losses, or matches its of major importance in how a character is handled.
Again, i like the NFW old-school format, though I'm sure some matches have been prebooked, and others left to angles, for the most part it's competition role-play, and ba ba ba ba i'm lovin' it.
What do you look for in role-play? Can role-play wars turn into more than: "You have bad hair." "Man, your wife is a skank." "I beat you once, I beat you again." "Yeah right."
Okay i'm actually posting that as the first Windham role-play to Eli. But, moving along.......is rp more than name-calling? Is it a game of who's the wittiest?
You get to a point, well I do at least, when how do you judge some of this? Who do you choose?
Angles? Long-term booking?
I look at the FWO (and other leagues like it) and think in some respects they 'get it'. That's the model I'd like the CSWA to use, but having recently joined there's much i'd change.
In the FWO role-play is recreational.
Handlers activity in the league is based on writing their own matches for cards (in narrative form) and any card segments, crash tv style or otherwise.
In some respects that makes perfect sense. All energy focused on getting cards up. The fwo moves like wild fire and the attractiveness in that is a big-time selling point.
However, as to my involvment in the league it's too angle based. Maybe that's just because i've spent so many years doing it one way. Finding your own matches in the league, essentially being left to book yourself has been a major letdown for me. In the fwo you're part of the writing team, and less of a character handler.
I've found that to steal a lot of my preacceptance into the league excitement. Having to scamper on AOL IM, or the message boards to ask for matches, and then decide who 'goes over' this week is so alien to his cold, black heart. At some point yes long term angles should come into play and handlers could book themselves for a while, but week to week it appears easy to be left out in the cold. But thats probably completely by own doing. There's nothing stopping me from signging onto the message board and saying, "Guys i need a match for Ruahh" and I'd probably get one.
Accepting that dramatic of a change in style has been hard.
But...i think the direction the CSWA needs to go, and a lot of where some of us are going, is a mixture of the two schools.
I'd want someone to book me, tell me who i'm facing week to week and who's going over, but more hands writing the cards, and more people brainstorming about angles for their characters is the way to go.
I"m ranting. Any thoughts to any of this?
Do win/loss records in FW matter?
Is a RP fed the best?
Is RP dead?
Am I the spawn of Louie Anderson for finding some fault with the FWO?
Will UCONN do the world a favor and beat Dook?
Does Marlena's recent serial killer turn mean a Marlena/Roman reunion is out of the picture?
Will the Lawerence Brothers ever work again?
And will Pete Russo begin talking in one-word replies in the near future?
These questions and more answered on the next.........."Tom Sigel Show".
(shudders trying to imagine that. It'd have to be "100 questions with Tom Sigel". That's the format. Heh.)
Last edited: