The best thing about e-feds is that they don't have to be realistic at all. The medium is infinite. Why limit ourselves?
Because creativity works better within parameters. That's like asking, "Why color inside the lines? I have this giant piece of paper and a big red crayon!" Because scribbling all over the page creates a bunch of nonsensical crap, and we can't tell what it's supposed to be when red, green, and blue are everywhere. "But I don't feel I should be limited by an outline of a dog!" That's great, so choose a different outline next time or go with a blank f*cking page.
Without going into how obscure or odd this hobby is (we all crossed that river long ago), e-wrestling is a creative outlet with a very clear outline: PRO-WRESTLING. Pretty much all of us are smart to how pro-wrestling works, and the necessary parameters that exist around character development, storylines, match psychology, and booking. Those are pretty wide parameters, right? They allow for a ton of creativity.
But we're still going to get people who can't color inside the lines. They insist on defying logic and the laws of physics by having their character commit murders, jobbing 300 pound men to 125 pound cheerleaders with sparkles on their face, and cutting non-promos in the confines of their private lives that are lived out in-character 24/7 unbeknownst to the "audience", i.e. the oft-ignored character that every e-fed has in common. Hey, that's cool. There's no law on the books that says your color book has to be any good. But when you submit it amongst your peers, many of whom were able to color their dog just fine without making it look like Crayola took an explosive sh*t on paper, don't become indignant when someone points out, "Hey, I think this guy forgot that we were supposed to be COLORING A G*DDAMN DOG."
Creative Writing 101: Obey the laws of the universe you create. FW is the universe, and you chose to live here. If the "pro-wrestling" setting is too restrictive on your creative impulses, find one that isn't or create your own.
This isn't a subjective argument over "narrative vs. script", or "angle versus roleplay". Logic is not subjective. Physics...NOT SUBJECTIVE. Style is one thing, but when your sh*t is downright illogical, there's no argument that can save it. Like it or not, your character is two people: a kayfabe gimmick, and a person. The gimmick exists for the sake of the audience. If you choose to write narrative or script passages that take place away from view of the audience, you must logically break your character's kayfabe at some point. The exceptions: character-actors and mentally unstable people. This is not my opinion - it's the implied logic of the hobby you choose to participate in.
TH is right that e-feds don't have to be realistic at all, in the way that no one is forcing you to write something that's any good. That is, you can be as
bad as you want, your dog coloring can be as sh*tty as your heart's content, and the only person who has to like any of it is your mom. Nobody is going to grab the crayon out of your hand. Feel free to suck - if you're facing me,
I want you to suck. In fact, I wish all my opponents would no-show like Jaguar did so I can float my way to Ultratitle, and when your character decides to show up and say, "Well you didn't really beat me, I didn't show up", I can say "Yes you did DUMMY, Chad Merritt wrote your little wrestler's legs all the way up to the imaginary ring where my wrestler beat him, and now I can brag about it all I want in roleplay and there's nothing you can do about it because LOGIC HAS MADE IT SO."
Or put another way: if logic and physics were in the Ultratitle, they would make it to the finals and fight to a DRAW because nobody can defeat either of them. Not even Zero.